8th EBLIDA Annual Council Meeting
| 05 May - 06 May 2000 |
| Madrid, Spain |
 |
The 8th Council Meeting was held in May 2000 at the Sat & Sat Formaciòn Conference Centre, in Madrid, Spain.
Chair: Britt-Marie Häggström, President EBLIDA
Presentations:
- Challenges and solutions for archives in Europe
by Erik Norberg, Svenska Arkivsamfundet, Sweden - Council of Europe/EBLIDA guidelines on library legislation and policy in Europe
by Ingrid Mauritzen, Legal Adviser to the National Library, Oslo, Norway - PULMAN: an EU project proposal with EBLIDA involvement
by Rob Davies, Education for Change Ltd, United Kingdom - Legal issues of interest to libraries - the e-commerce directive and public access to information policy papers. Update on the TECUP project.
by Emanuella Giavarra, Legal Adviser to EBLIDA - www.licensingmodels.com - model standard licenses
by John Cox, John Cox Associates - Distributed National Electronic Resource: latest UK developments
by Alicia Wise, Collections Manager, JISC, United Kingdom
< back to overview
NEWS
EBLIDA Newsletter September 2018
13 September 2018: Read the current Newsletter with the range of activities and interests, library & information society news from Europe, Brussels, EBLIDA and beyond. Read more >
Digital Single Market Directive - the European Parliament lays a Curate’s Egg
13 September 2018: PRESS RELEASE: Yesterday, after two years deliberation, the European Parliament voted on its amendments to the draft Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. Read more >-
Job opportunity at EBLIDA
12 July 2018: EBLIDA invites applications for the position of Director, at EBLIDA Office in The Hague, Netherlands. Read more > -
EBLIDA Newsletter July-August 2018
12 July 2018: This double issue of the newsletter covers the months of July and August. Enjoy reading! Read more > 
Shambolic JURI Committee vote on Copyright
22 June 2018: As a major advocate of the library and information sector, while EBLIDA welcomes the encouraging outcomes on some of the Articles, the overall result of the JURI’s deliberations is actually rather lacklustre and in places rather negative for libraries, education and research. Read more >